Données techniques du sapir.psych.wisc.edu
Geo IP vous fournit comme la latitude, la longitude et l'ISP (Internet Service Provider) etc. informations.
Notre service GeoIP a trouvé l'hôte sapir.psych.wisc.edu.Actuellement, hébergé dans United States et son fournisseur de services est University of Wisconsin Madison .
| Latitude: |
43.075290679932 |
| Longitude: |
-89.411415100098 |
| Pays: |
United States (us)
|
| Ville: |
Madison |
| Région: |
Wisconsin |
| ISP: |
University of Wisconsin Madison |
Analyse d'en-tête HTTP
Les informations d'en-tête HTTP font partie du protocole HTTP que le navigateur d'un utilisateur envoie à appelé Apache/2.4.18 (Ubuntu) contenant les détails de ce que le navigateur veut et acceptera de nouveau du serveur Web.
| Content-Length: | 11361 |
| Content-Encoding: | gzip |
| Vary: | Accept-Encoding |
| Keep-Alive: | timeout=5, max=100 |
| Server: | Apache/2.4.18 (Ubuntu) |
| Connection: | Keep-Alive |
| Link: | ; rel="https://api.w.org/", ; rel=shortlink |
| Date: | Mon, 11 Jun 2018 18:30:40 GMT |
| Content-Type: | text/html; charset=UTF-8 |
DNS
| ipv4: | IP:128.104.130.118
ASN:59
OWNER:WISC-MADISON-AS - University of Wisconsin Madison, US
Country:US
|
HtmlToText
skip to content lupyan lab university of wisconsin-madison home people publications chronological category teaching stimuli lab philosophy internal/wiki welcome to the lab in what ways is human cognition language-augmented cognition ? we are a very strange animal. one of the strangest aspects is our use of language — a culturally transmitted open-ended compositional system of communication. we are interested in understanding whether, and to what extent, language is responsible for distinguishing human cognition from that of other animals. work in the lab has been examining how perception, categorization, memory, and reasoning are augmented by learning and using words. a recent direction of this work is to view words as high-level hypotheses within a hierarchical predictive system. review and theory papers describing this work can be found here , here , here , and here . we are also trying to understand what precise information we learn from direct experience versus from the statistics of language. these ideas are described in a forthcoming paper, available here . several current projects in the lab involve large-scale comparisons of cross-linguistic word embeddings to discover the ways in which different languages convey similar versus distinct information at a statistical level. we are also actively investigating the role of ‘nameability’. does it matter if some feature or relation happens to have a compact verbal form? (hint: yes it does!). on this view, what makes some categories difficult to learn and reason about is not that they are inherently difficult, but that they happen to not have compact verbal expressions. you can read some popular-media coverage from the new york times , new scientist , a review of a recent paper on an npr blog or listen to gary lupyan talking to shane mauss on the here we are podcast why are there different languages? do languages adapt to the needs and biases of their learners and users? one of the most remarkable aspects of language is its diversity. although all natural languages share certain design features, such as the use of discrete words and a compositional structure, languages vary enormously in their patterns of naming and in the grammatical devices they employ. what forces are responsible for creating these differences? do languages diversify simply due to random drift, as has been long assumed? or might there be some selection at work that drives languages apart in a way analogous to the forces that produce diversity in the biological realm? we have been investigating how languages are affected by social and demographic factors such as the number and diversity of language-users. we term the idea that languages adapt to biases of their users, the linguistic-niche hypothesis. this work is funded by an nsf inspire award. you can read more about this work in the new scientist , the economist , read a recent chapter on this topic, or a review in trends in cognitive sciences . ongoing projects involve systematically comparing linguistic redundancy (compressibility) and determining whether the high redundancy of some languages has a functional role, namely helping young children learn the language. how do programming language influence human cognition? physical tools such as microscopes and telescopes have expanded the range of our senses and allowed for scientific discoveries that would be impossible without these tools. far from being cloistered in scientific journals, the discoveries that these tools made possible have transformed what people think and do (skeptical? think germ theory of disease). in addition to such physical tools, modern science makes extensive use of computational tools ranging from programming languages to statistics packages and data-analytic environments. in what ways is scientific progress and human reasoning itself being transformed by these tools? we have recently begun a sloan foundation funded project to investigate this question using approaches that include large-scale data-gathering (e.g., analyzing github repositories) and experimental (e.g., examining how source code evolves as it passes from one person to the next). to what extent is what we perceive affected by what we know and expect? we perceive as we do because our perceptual systems have been honed by evolution to transform energy into forms useful for guiding our actions. this process is flexible in that our current needs often determine what form of information is useful. work in the lab examines how knowledge and expectations can act as priors changing how people perceive. many of these investigations involve testing how language may augment (visual) perception. these studies take as inspiration edward sapir’s remark that “e ven comparatively simple acts of perception [may be] very much more at the mercy of the social patterns called words than we might suppose”. our work on this topic can be found here . you can also popular press coverage of some of this work here and here , and read a in-depth review of how such top-down effects on perception arise when one views the brain in a predictive-coding framework. we are winding down this research direction in the lab. why are some explanations especially satisfying? why do different scientists prefer different theories to account for the same data? some explanations seem very compelling, even if they are factually wrong. other explanations seem completely unsatisfying, even if they are, technically speaking, correct. a new line of research is examining what makes some explanations more satisfying than others and why some people prefer some types of explanations. in a related project, we are examining whether certain cognitive biases predict whether a given scientist prefers one type of theory/explanatory framework over another. this work is part of the templeton-funded metaknowledge network. openings in the lab we are looking for a postdoc (possibly 2) who are interested in (1) examining causal relationships between preschool children’s language development and their cognitive performance, and (2) examining the role of featural and dimensional nameability on category learning/induction in adults. if you are interested, please send us an mail with your vitae and research goals. the lab is accepting graduate students . if you are interested, please send us an email . applicants are advised to look through the lab’s recent publications. if you are an undergraduate at uw-madison interested in getting involved as a research assistant, please complete this online application. news can a game of vocal charades act out the origin of language? the benefits of talking to yourself (nyt) buzz! thwack! how sounds become words why dogs growl and light flickers iconicity may play a surprisingly large role in the english language some of the lab's work mentioned in new scientist feature article on language gary lupyan on shane mauss's here we are podcast. spoken language could tap into 'universal code' recreating language’s big bang through a game of vocal charades words jump-start vision the magic of words: transcending the tyranny of the specific © 2018 lupyan lab - theme: patus by famethemes .
Informations Whois
Whois est un protocole qui permet d'accéder aux informations d'enregistrement.Vous pouvez atteindre quand le site Web a été enregistré, quand il va expirer, quelles sont les coordonnées du site avec les informations suivantes. En un mot, il comprend ces informations;
This Registry database contains ONLY .EDU domains.
The data in the EDUCAUSE Whois database is provided
by EDUCAUSE for information purposes in order to
assist in the process of obtaining information about
or related to .edu domain registration records.
The EDUCAUSE Whois database is authoritative for the
.EDU domain.
A Web interface for the .EDU EDUCAUSE Whois Server is
available at: http://whois.educause.net
By submitting a Whois query, you agree that this information
will not be used to allow, enable, or otherwise support
the transmission of unsolicited commercial advertising or
solicitations via e-mail. The use of electronic processes to
harvest information from this server is generally prohibited
except as reasonably necessary to register or modify .edu
domain names.
You may use "%" as a wildcard in your search. For further
information regarding the use of this WHOIS server, please
type: help
--------------------------
Domain Name: WISC.EDU
Registrant:
University of Wisconsin
Division of Information Technology
1210 West Dayton Street B332
Madison, WI 53706
UNITED STATES
Administrative Contact:
Hostmaster
University of Wisconsin - Madison
Division of Information Technology
1210 West Dayton Street B332
Madison, WI 53706
UNITED STATES
(608) 263-4188
hostmaster@wisc.edu
Technical Contact:
NOC
University of Wisconsin - Madison
Division of Information Technology
1210 West Dayton Street B332
Madison, WI 53706
UNITED STATES
(608) 263-4188
noc@doit.wisc.edu
Name Servers:
ADNS1.DOIT.WISC.EDU 144.92.9.21, 2607:f388::a53:1
ADNS2.DOIT.WISC.EDU 144.92.20.99, 2607:f388::a53:2
ADNS3.DOIT.WISC.EDU 144.92.104.21, 2607:f388::a53:3
DNS2.ITD.UMICH.EDU
Domain record activated: 30-Sep-1985
Domain record last updated: 12-May-2010
Domain expires: 31-Jul-2017
REFERRER http://whois.educause.net
REGISTRAR EDUCASE
SERVERS
SERVER edu.whois-servers.net
ARGS wisc.edu
PORT 43
TYPE domain
RegrInfo
OWNER
NAME University of Wisconsin
ADDRESS
Division of Information Technology
1210 West Dayton Street B332
Madison, WI 53706
UNITED STATES
ADMIN
PHONE (608) 263-4188
EMAIL hostmaster@wisc.edu
NAME Hostmaster
ADDRESS
University of Wisconsin - Madison
Division of Information Technology
1210 West Dayton Street B332
Madison, WI 53706
UNITED STATES
TECH
PHONE (608) 263-4188
EMAIL noc@doit.wisc.edu
NAME NOC
ADDRESS
University of Wisconsin - Madison
Division of Information Technology
1210 West Dayton Street B332
Madison, WI 53706
UNITED STATES
DOMAIN
NSERVER
ADNS1.DOIT.WISC.EDU 144.92.9.21
ADNS2.DOIT.WISC.EDU 144.92.20.99
ADNS3.DOIT.WISC.EDU 144.92.104.21
DNS2.ITD.UMICH.EDU 192.12.80.222
CREATED 1985-09-30
CHANGED 2010-05-12
NAME wisc.edu
REGISTERED yes
Go to top
sapir.psych.wisc.edu rapport :
Visitez le site
